Persistent Deal Memory
A canonical, versioned deal story graph that survives across meetings, interfaces, model versions, and seller changes.
SAIQ is the revenue-specialized reasoning layer between the AI your team talks to and the CRM your business runs on.
Provides the general-purpose reasoning and conversational interface.
Maintains the persistent deal story, runs qualification against your commercial ontology, and evaluates true stakeholder state — governed and reproducible.
Executes governed workflows, permissions, and cross-system data federation — ServiceNow, Salesforce, HubSpot, or any CRM you already own.
One remote MCP server — SAIQ's deal intelligence renders natively in Claude, ChatGPT, Slack, Teams, and your CRM's AI surface. One integration, every surface.
Third-party names are the property of their owners; SAIQ is an independent layer, not an endorsement.
A deal is not a row in a table — it is a living story evolving over time. Three layers of intelligence keep it current, reasoned, and grounded.
Monitors accounts and ingests signals continuously — meeting transcripts, emails, stakeholder changes, company news, earnings calls. No manual logging, no data entry.
Maps stakeholders, scores the opportunity against your commercial ontology, and recalculates only the delta when something changes — pushing the next best action daily, with the reasoning traceable behind every score.
Grounds each deal in Aniline's perception data — 1B+ employee-insight data points plus public disclosures — so context reflects reality, not guesswork.
A general AI agent on top of your data is a demo. These six are the difference between a demo and a system your revenue org can run on.
A canonical, versioned deal story graph that survives across meetings, interfaces, model versions, and seller changes.
Product intelligence packs with atomic value drivers, scoring models, buyer personas, disqualifiers, and bundle logic.
Not just names — currentness verification, role certainty, influence hypotheses, decision relevance, and freshness status.
After each new signal — meeting transcript, email, news event — recalculate only what changed, expose the implication, and update the deal story.
Human-in-the-loop pause/resume, structured outcome classes, approval routing, traceability, and explainability.
Versioned workflows, measurable confidence markers, evidence displays, and backtesting against real deal outcomes.
Re-explain the deal from scratch, every session.

Picks up the deal's story exactly where it left off.
You'd notice instantly — you'd be the one holding the context, not the system.
This is the one a competitor can't catch up on later. Copying the schema takes a month; recreating two years of captured deal history is impossible, because the moment it happened is gone the moment it's not captured. A late arrival can't go back and record the champion's comment from a meeting that already ended.
Reasons from the public internet, not your catalog.

Scores every deal against your actual value drivers and disqualifiers.
It would recommend things your own product can't back up.
Product-aware reasoning is the cleanest version of this claim — it starts from what you actually sell and works outward to the accounts that have the pain, not the other way around.
Lists whatever names it's told, with no way to check them.

Verifies who still holds the role and flags when a champion goes quiet.
It would still list someone as a live stakeholder six months after they left the company.
A stale stakeholder repeated confidently is worse than no answer at all — it's the specific failure mode that costs a deal, not just a research hour.
Re-reasons from scratch every time, at full cost.

Recalculates only what changed since the last signal.
Every question would cost the same and take as long as the first one, even when nothing changed.
Re-deriving everything per question is token-economically absurd at portfolio scale. A maintained story amortizes; a fresh session every time doesn't.
No approval routing, no pause point, no outcome classes.

Pauses for human sign-off outside a set confidence threshold, full audit trail.
There'd be no way to know whether a recommendation needed a human's sign-off before it acted.
This is what makes enterprise buyers comfortable letting AI act at all — never silent failure, never hallucinated certainty.
Ask it twice, get two different answers, no way to know which to trust.

Same input, same rigor — versioned workflows backtested against real outcomes.
You'd get a different answer every time you asked, with no way to know which one to trust.
Two sellers asking the same question should get one governed answer with the same citations, not two different guesses on two different days.
Any LLM + SAIQ beats any LLM alone.
ChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, and Gemini are brilliant generalists that answer any question once. SAIQ is the specialized system that knows every deal's story, enforces your sales methodology, operates continuously, and writes governed intelligence back to your CRM.